Saturday, November 10, 2018

European Parliament addresses American radio frequency weapons that "manipulate human beings " in 1999.

In 1999 the STOA (Scientific and Technological Options Assessment), part of the Directorate General for Research of the European Parliament published a report on Crowd Control Technologies. In the report, it discusses radio frequency weapons that manipulate human beings. It states that:
”This report evaluates the second generation of ‘non-lethal’ weapons which are emerging from national military and nuclear weapons laboratories in the United States as part of the Clinton Administration’s ‘non-lethal’ warfare doctrine now adopted in turn by NATO. These devices include weapons using… directed energy beam,…radio frequency, laser and acoustic mechanisms to incapacitate human targets” The report states that „the most controversial ‚non-lethal‘ crowd control … technology proposed by the U.S., are so called Radio Frequency or Directed Energy Weapons that can allegedly manipulate human behavior… the greatest concern is with systems which can directly interact with the human nervous system“ The report also states that „perhaps the most powerful developments remain shrouded in secrecy“

Sunday, September 16, 2018

religious motivation for the Targeted Individual program:

I believe that the religious motivation for Security Services Stalking varies as well. The religion identified most with the program is Satanism and there is hard evidence for the involvement of satanism in the program with Michael Aquino's involvement and documents attributed to him about psychological warfare and mind wars. However, I'll believe that there's no other religious element or involvement to the Security Services Stalking program when churches acknowledge the crimes, denounce the activity and support those targeted. As it stands now, only The Swiss Catholic church acknowledges mind control technology and that's as far as they go. I believe that Christian participants, for example, see the Targeted as people to sacrifice for some higher authority's purpose, ultimately their God. They abuse and destroy targeted persons for their God's purpose. In some sense, the 300,000 targeted persons all live out some sick performance of Jesus Christ Superstar. For some Christians, the targeted may also represent Demons or anti-christs that they are 'battling.' I believe there is eastern religious involvement as well. Much of the human trafficking conditioning has to do with destroying the targets self esteem and making some sort of authoritarian commentary on the targeted's ego or sense of self.

Thursday, August 2, 2018

18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 696Pub. L. 90–284, title I, § 103(b), Apr. 11, 196882 Stat. 75Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7019, Nov. 18, 1988102 Stat. 4396Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60006(b), title XXXII, §§ 320103(b), 320201(b), title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994108 Stat. 1970, 2109, 2113, 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §§ 604(b)(14)(B), 607(a), Oct. 11, 1996110 Stat. 3507, 3511.)

Saturday, July 21, 2018

*This is the true face of CYBER Warfare:*


Came across this today. This appeared in the International Law Journal of London posted by Kim O'neill
*This is the true face of CYBER Warfare:*
INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL OF LONDON *November 25th, 2014* by Dr. Parasaran Rangarajan
*PROTECTING BRAINWAVES CONSIDERING SIGNAL INTELLIGENCE ADVANCES* (Abstract)
“*This article aims to demonstrate and explore the avenues for Protection of Brainwaves of Ideas in relation to Advances in Surveillance Technology, more specifically Signal Intelligence Technology*, via three sections:
1. Describing the *Advances in Signal Intelligence Technology today and its Relevance to Brainwaves*. Also discussed is the Anatomical description of Brainwaves.
2. Then, *we build on the basis that These Technologies Exist and the Need to Seek Legal Protection from them*. Various Electronic Communication Law and Human Right Laws including cases are introduced.
3. The last part deals with both transnational law with the steps the European Union (E.U.) has taken to offer protection under international law, both as an intellectual property and human rights issue.
Section one is split into two parts. In the *first part*; the article *explains the Advances in Electronic Signal Intelligence Technology including U.S. patented Electromagnetic Devices which are Designed to Read, Alter, and even Attack Brainwaves*. Important *Scientific Proof of Reading Brainwaves and the Mind* by Reconstructing Thoughts "Word for Word" from Various Research Institutions as well as *using Wireless Electroencephalography (EEG)* which have demonstrated *similar to "iBrain" Product* is presented to provide the basis for the rest of the article. Some of the *Dangers and Capabilities of these devices are stated by the facts*. In the second part; the article explains an anatomical views of brainwaves in the case that they cannot be viewed as electronic communications but viewed as the heart for example despite the advances in signal intelligence technology. Theoretical discussions by various authorities and scholars are presented. An introduction to the various human rights legislature which have been introduced in the past is also stated and *Direct Energy Weapons (DEW) as well as Active Denial Systems* (ADS) are explained. We also go various *Electromagnetic Brain Frequencies Emitted which can Explain States of Mind including the Schumann Resonance (7.83 Hz) phenomenon when your brainwaves are one with the earth’s electromagnetic spectrum eminences*.
*Section two deals with Protecting Our Rights in relation to Intellectual Property and Human Rights* and is divided into two scenarios. Under the first scenario; we focus in on *Protecting Brainwaves* given the two scenarios above being *viewed as “electronic communications” and “data” given that there is consent or judicial sanction*. In this scenario, the article reviews the relevant case law such in the U.S. for limits on warrantless surveillance where intellectual property rights are taken away including the defense related provisions such as the Patriot Act (2001). In addition to intellectual property laws, classic cases on electronic surveillance for practical purposes such as discovery and subpoenas such as Katz v. United States (1935) are discussed in relevance with the electromagnetic technologies of today. An analysis of existing laws such as the Electronic Communications Protection Act (ECPA) including the need for reforms on the lines of the *Public Act 256 of 2003 in Michigan which has expressly banned Electromagnetic Devices for Harmful uses* is conducted. Under the second scenario; protection of brainwaves are discussed as a human rights issue and the various *U.S. human rights legislation is brought up such as the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA) in addition to international legislation the U.S. is bound by and relatively new cases on this subject such as James Walbert v. Jerimiah Redford (2008) which is the first case in U.S. history to Recognize Electromagnetic Weapons being Used Against a Person*.
*Section three* is also divided into two parts and *focuses on International Law and Transnational Law on Protecting Brainwaves in as both “Electronic communications” and “data” as well as examining the issue from a Human Rights Perspective*. First; *European Union law is introduced with issued Regulations and Directives which have Banned Surveillance on "Biometric" and "Genetic data" which is Applicable to Brainwaves*. In the second part dealing with International law; we discuss to *Protect Intellectual Property of Brainwaves through customary international law such as the “International Bill for Human Rights”, various United Nations (U.N.) Conventions, and options available for seeking remedy*. The role of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) is discussed and *we also explore the need for drafting a separate U.N. Convention for this purpose with reference to the utilitarian-pragmatic argument considering the philosophy of thought in society*.
The article is concluded by stating that *We have long ways to go in Protecting our Brainwaves due to Technological Advances in Signal Intelligence* although we have gotten off to a fair start in the U.S., E.U., and internationally.
http://www.internationallawjournaloflondon.com/protecting-b…
(Note from channel - *Laws exist Every Where for Protection & Prosecution for this type of Crime - International, National, even States - yet No One Is listening nor Abiding by Any of them*)

Sunday, July 8, 2018

Email responses from thread that led to shutting down and destroying my new computer

I want to share my email thread that led to the shutting down of my computer, but I can't share someone else's private communication, so here is the content of my responses:


Hi Heidi,
I'm
sorry for your targeting. I think it's possible that
there are black hats and white hat handlers. One being
darker than the other and more evil, but they are all evil.
My handlers could kill me at any time and could torture me
into more terrible existence but do not. It only makes sense
that if they attack me and I have the internet to turn to
that they can see the effect of targeting me. When they do I
go to the internet and meetup with other targets share the
story etc. It seems pretty clear to me that they want me to
do this. They even gave me the name Brooke like Brooke Hogan
to express that they were 'making me' like in the
show she was on. They also expressed that what they are
doing was like a twisted game of professional wrestling.
Sometimes they even give me positive feedback for going
online. They also want to control what I say and so that I
have a tight message, and they'll give me negative
feedback from time to time depending on what I say and
think. The whole thing is a psychological operation with
targets being sacrificed for the psyops...
What was your journalism about? I
believe they have wanted me to believe that there was some
jealousy reason for my targeting, but I think it is
political.
Best,
Dominic Friscia
Other Response:
Well that would be a reason they would attack you. I don't know the motives of your handlers. They could be trying to hide that they are sacrificing disabled kids lives at schools. In my case, they want me to be an influential agent, so they sacrifice my freedom and dignity because there is something I say that they want to lend credibility to. If the government hounds you then people think "well there must be something they don't want people knowing" and they pay attention to what you say. The secondary aspect to the targeting is that they are human traffickers trying to control me. Also When I'm less bloated they harass me more to make sure I don't have self esteem etc.

Saturday, June 2, 2018

Ongoing Analysis and some details about Targeted Individual program from one victim: unfinished...


My name is Dominic Friscia. I began writing this document in 2018 about 9 years after becoming aware that I was a victim or a target of what is called “Security Services Stalking,” also known as Gangstalking. It is choppy. I write it within bouts of harassment by FBI CIA NSA Homeland Security etc.  It is something that my handlers have wanted me to do as well as make videos. They want me to write a book, but I don't know if I will ever be able to, so this blog will have to do for now.

In the Summer of 2009, I applied for and accepted a job at Habitat for Humanity in San Diego. I had been suspicious that certain people at my previous employer, The New Children’s Museum, were conducting surveillance on behalf of the government or somebody else (at the time it was a bit ambiguous). One of these people recruited me to Habitat for Humanity and I foolishly thought it would be a good chance to figure out why these people were so interested in me that they would infiltrate my work place and spy on me. I did not know at the time that my thoughts were being monitored. I applied for and accepted a position at Habitat in San Diego. At the time, I was decently politically active by going to meetings at a church on behalf of the organization, San Diego Coalition for  Peace and Justice, and participating in some protests. My memory escapes me, but some of them had to do with the drone bombings or pro immigrant rallies as well. The meetings at San Diego Coalition for Peace and Justice were small meetings, just a handful of activists. At the time, I was very interested in the Guatemalan Genocide and the fact that thousands of people in San Diego had reported being victims of torture at one point in their lives. I saw California as an international headquarters and the governance and intelligence structure as being global.  This is not to parrot Alex Jones or the common propaganda on the internet that devalues Human Rights or International law, or the idea of global governance, agreed upon democratically. I had various social justice interests or ideas, one was Universal Jurisdiction and another was that I thought that it was possibly a good idea to make housing a constitutional right in America. I reasoned, at the time, that if the Second Amendment was enacted to protect property so that you are a secure person, then a right to the housing to secure yourself, housing that the gun protected, wasn’t unreasonable. I didn’t know how it would work, and I don’t even know if it is a good idea, but I just offer that as an example of information that the government had on me when they were conducting their surveillance and then funneled me into Habitat.

While at Habitat, I worked on building projects that had volunteers from many major defense and intelligence contractors, as well as a project sponsored by Luis Palau, a preacher with close ties to the Guatemalan Dictator Efrain Rios Montt, responsible for genocide in Guatemala. One defense contractor or intelligence contractor was the company in which Richard Helms was CEO of at one point. The information about Helms has since been deleted from public places on the internet, so I can’t remember what company he was alleged to be CEO of.  In accordance with the erasure, it is apt to remind the reader that Richard Helms has been revealed to be instrumental in destroying evidence of the MK Ultra programs run during the 60s and 70s. In about May of 2010, I became fully aware that I was being stalked and harassed by some organization. I had previously been suspicious.( I have detailed the incident in which I became fully aware in the "attempted Assassination attempted murder blog post elsewhere on this blog). I finished the year at Habitat for Humanity and eventually blew the whistle on a discrimination case against a Muslim Family. Upon finishing my year, I decided to regroup and moved home to Saugus, CA with my parents, thinking some organization in San Diego was harassing and threatening me. I reasoned that I would be able to let things die down and thought of positives like saving money etc. It is possible that I got blacklisted here, because I applied for numerous positions and thought I was qualified and didn't get hired, but I don't know. People would make gestures in interviews that were gangstalking gestures. I eventually decided going back to school for a teaching credential or Masters was my best avenue, but during this time the voice to skull attacks began and gangstalking ratcheted up.

 I believe that the word spy or surveillance are poor descriptions of what happens to targets or victims of Security Services Stalking or gangstalking once they go full throttle on you. They can attempt assassination(which they did to me detailed in another post on this blog titled Attempted Murder Assassination Attempt), torture and abuse you to no end. It took me a while to put it into these terms because I was reading so much literature that put it into other terms, the origin of which I am unsure of. But Targets are victims of a state sponsored human trafficking operation. If you read the actual legal definition of human trafficking by the United Nations, the Security Services Stalking and targeting program meet the definition of trafficking. The Mayor of Richmond California, Tom Butt, wrote in an open letter that Targeted Individuals have their lives controlled for profit.  I don’t really want to get into all the details of how they harass me. But it includes general harassment, sexual harassment, mental torture and physical if you consider threatening heart attacks, sleep deprivation, simulated rapes and momentarily paralyzing you as such. I will offer a general synopsis. There exists a massive scale operation in which a supercomputer Artificial Intelligence system communicates and directs security personnel or the general public to carry human trafficking directives and harassment messages focused on singular targeted persons.

In allegedly declassified Community Policing Training documents, it describes a term called: "Active Surveillance" and it says that "active surveillance includes the agent making the target aware that they are under surveillance. Beyond active surveillance, agents perform acts to make the targeted uncomfortable, around the clock." It goes on to say that each act should be done so as to be deniable and that this form of 'punishment' must be seen as the target's 'over active imagination.' On page two of the document, it refers to advanced technology used for 'electronic punishment' which can go through walls and is 'deniable.' It also describes using "psychologists to maximize feelings of stress and hopelessness in the target and degrading the target's health" Current literature in the mainstream press is all propaganda to disguise this massive operation affecting hundreds of thousands of people with what appear to be carefully manufactured leaks, perhaps for cultural production or all as an element of that production. Leaked video from an organization called CSIS revealed that the annual budget for this global blackops program is 270 billion dollars. Janet Phelan, of LA Progressive, wrote an article asking if the U.S was a 'mock up,' meaning they are running a mock government to obscure the true operations of a tyrannical system. There are many ways in which this is revealed to the public. For instance, Dan Rather described the Russia-Trump drama or investigation as a stage and theater with actors. Instead of reacting to organic events, the CIA and NSA are dedicated to creating events and then blasting them through the media where they can manage a scripted reality. They call these events Psyops or Psychological Operations. So Rather’s words would be an odd choice of words were it not for the fact that the government runs large scale psychological operations in which they hire crisis actors to stage events. On the surface, the government admits to running these operations as large scale emergency  drills. Rather, seemingly as some sort of cultural producer, presents this statement with full knowledge that it is not an analogy. Perhaps the most striking example of this activity was the staging of a car bomb in Iraq in which tens of people were 'caught' on camera staging a car bomb that had faked victims. The video is featured below and was covered by newspapers online but notably not by many major publications:




 Another example of the government deliberately revealing themselves to be underhandedly dishing out injustice is James Comey’s statement on twitter in which he says the following:

"Dangerous time when our country is led by those who will lie about anything, backed by those who will believe anything, based on information from media sources that will say anything. Americans must break out of that bubble and seek truth."

 This is an example of cultural production on the part of a former head of the FBI, revealing motive behind Targeted Individual program: Comey is talking about himself as well and revealing an inside joke. As evidence of the Targeted Individual program being used as some sort of staged sacrifice of targets, I offer public documentation of a man named Tony Frank who was filmed gangstalking a TI. Tony Frank stated while gangstalking that he was a Targeted Individual himself and that his whole family had been tagged in the 90s with his sister sadly killing herself. He stated that he was gangstalking and destroying the filming TI’s life so that he filmed it and put it on the internet. 

There are probably numerous motives for footsoldiers participating in Security Services Stalking or gangstalking. I believe there are five or six main motives for the participants. 1. They get paid or receive some sort of benefit for participating or it is their job. 2. They think the behavior is funny or fun. 3. Some are driven by some ideological cause. 4. Some are driven by some religious cause. 5. They are sadists. 6. Some are driven by a belief in science and that you are a good subject to engage with and see you as a political science experiment or psychological, weapons testing experiment etc.

I believe the ideological motivation for Security Services Stalking varies. I believe that some people are communists or collectivists who think they are acting in the interests of the collective in symbolically destroying an individual and taking control away from the individual. Some are anti communists who attack individuals for the purpose of propaganda creation and cultural production, as the Targeted produce content describing the abuse of the State and collective community mobbing. Another ideological motive for participants in Security Services Stalking, I believe, is driven as an exploration of the rights of the individual vs the state. In this case, I believe there is an overlap of ideological motive and scientific 'inquiry' motive. I believe that some people studied 19th century German political thought and the Hegelian dialectic and see the targeting program as some political science experiment to further 'inquiry' into the subject matter. I believe these people are ideologically driven by the Hegelian Dialectic and are creating the problem for a reaction (my writing for example) and thus a solution such as Corporations Dissolving, limited government etc. These people may in fact be the controllers or Directors with a managerial class and foot soldiers motivated by various causes and purposes.



Under the program it is had for me to concentrate, so I will be editing and adding to this throughout the year.. this is just how i am able to piece all of the information together as i have mostly only written things down in social media and I get access to these once a year..so thats just the way of my documentation for now..

Monday, April 23, 2018

List of crimes associated with #RemoteNeuralMonitoring. It was put together by a prisoner, who I believe is named Mary Fowler: (They used all caps)

CRIMES ASSOCIATED: (REMOTE NEURAL MONITORING)
1.) RUNNING A CORRUPT ORGANIZATION
2.) CRIMINAL RACKETEERING USING ARTIFICIAL TELEPATHY & THE TECHNOLOGY
OF MIND CONTROL.
3.) MULTIPLE COUNTS OF FRAUD AND DISHONEST BUSINESS PRACTICES
4.) THE CRIME OF GRAND LARCENY (5,000 OR MORE)
5.) MISAPPROPRIATION OF GOVERNMENT FUNDING
6.) FEDERAL HUMAN RIGHTS VIOLATIONS
7.) CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT (8TH AMEND)
8.) BREACH OF FEDERAL PRIVACY LAWS
9.) BREACH OF OBSCENITY LAWS OF CALIFORNIA
10.) BREACH OF PEEPING TOM ACT OF CALIFORNIA
11.) ILLEGAL SEARCH AND SEIZURE
12.) FELONY INVASION OF PRIVACY
13.) ORGANIZED ELECTRONIC STALKING
14.) OVER REPREHENSIBLE CONDUCT
15.) WILLFUL ENDANGERMENT OF INMATE WELFARE
16.) CHILD ENDANGERMENT (JUVENILE FACILITIES)
17.) MULTIPLE COUNTS OF SEXUAL HARASSMENT (WOMEN'S FACILITIES)
18.) TRAFFICKING THE LEWD IMAGES OF A MINOR (C.Y.A INMATES)
19.) CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MURDER
20.) EMBEZZLING A GOVERNMENT PROGRAM
21.) WRONGFUL DEFAMATION OF CHARACTER & SLANDER
22.) DOUBLE JEOPARDY & WRONGFUL PROSECUTION
23.) FELONY OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE (18 U.S.C SEC. 1501-1523)
24.) CHILD PORNOGRAPHY CHARGES (JUVENILE FACILITIES)
25.) UNLAWFUL INTRUSION AND ILLEGAL EASES-DROPPING
26.) INVOLUNTARY HUMAN EXPERIMENTATION (INMATES/PAROLEES EXPOSED TO
HARMFUL TECHNOLOGIES).
27.) INCOMPATIBLE ACTIVITY (CDCR TITLE 15 SEC. 3413.)
28.) FEDERAL RICO ACT VIOLATIONS (18 U.S.C 1961-1968)
29.) ILLEGAL MISUSE OF NCIC COMPUTER TECHNOLOGIES
30.) MANIPULATION OF GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS
31.) PERJURY AND OMISSION (SPECIAL SECRECY AGREEMENT)
32.) UNLAWFUL COMMUNICATIONS (SYNTHETIC TELEPATHY)
33.) UNLAWFUL ELECTRONIC SURVEILLANCE & RECORDING
34.) ILLEGAL ENTRAPMENT (4TH & 5TH AMENDMENT)
35.) PARTICIPATING IN AN ILLEGAL ENTERPRISE
36.) USING THE NCIC SUPERCOMPUTER TO INTENTIONALLY INFLICT GREAT
EMOTIONAL DISTRESS ON A CDCR INMATE/PAROLEE.
37.) USING THE NCIC SUPERCOMPUTER TO SMUGGLE ILLEGAL CONTRABAND
TO CDCR INMATES IN THE FORM OF LEWD/PORNOGRAPHIC IMAGES OF A MINOR.
38.) TAPPING THE CRIMINAL DATABASE ON BEHALF OF THE SUR-13
39.) FAILURE TO REPORT A CRIME (PERSONS HAD A CIVIC DUTY)
40.) CRIME OF ACCESSORY AND ACCESSORY AFTER THE FACT

Thursday, March 8, 2018

Attempted Murder/ Assassination Attempt

In September of 2009, I joined an Americorps program with Habitat for Humanity. I was recruited into the program by a co-worker. Previous to joining the Americorps program in San Diego, I was very interested in the Guatemalan Genocide and Universal Jurisdiction. At my Americorps program, I ended up working on a project sponsored by Luis Palau, who had been closely associated with The Guatemalan Genocidal Dictator Efrain Rios Montt. In May or June of 2010, I began being stalked in public places by people and started receiving threats in seemingly random incongruous incidents throughout the rest of that year through 2010. In July of 2010, I was approached at a train station by a guy who indicated that he knew everything I was doing, who I was meeting, where I was going etc. He, subsequently, stated that someone should assassinate Arnold Schwarzenegger and Barak Obama. I figured he was some sort of law enforcement. I contemplated contacting the Secret Service. I texted a message to a family member and was persuaded not to contact the Secret Service. I figured that since they spy on everyone, that they read my text in the event that the guy wasn't law enforcement. A few months later, someone tried to assassinate me. In August of 2010, I spoke with a journalist named Katherine Hughes about an incident which occured during my Americorps program. I divulged that Habitat for Humanity in San Diego had discriminated against a Muslim family. So I believe this was whistleblowing. I engaged in protests throughout 2010 and 2011. In april of 2011, I engaged in a protest against the Libyan bombings sponsored by the group ANSWER. A few days later, in April of 2011, I was threatened by two women who identified themselves as police officers. I was at Starbucks reading a book and they sat down next to me and engaged in directed conversation. They began talking to harass me and threatened that they fuck people up when they arrest them and that they "fuck people up when they least suspect it." They kept talking about people "crossing the line." They sat next to me for a few hours. A few days later, I was attacked on the highway in what appeared to be a staged car accident. A woman in a car next to me pulled alongside of me and maintained identical speed with me for 5-10 seconds and then swerved into my lane spinning out of control. I refrained from driving and had cars synchronize going past my house at my exact exit. By September of 2011 I went to San Francisco and on the way home was recipient of another staged car accident and threat on the highway. In October of 2011 I participated in Occupy Los Angeles for 40 days or so. During one of the days' staged protest at Bank of America, I witnessed a plainclothed 'protester' signal with his hand while standing next to me. He signaled to the officer on the gun to target me in their final assault on the protesters that were encircled there. Just a few weeks earlier, a veteran had been shot in the head with a rubber bullet and it fractured his skull. I left Occupy Los Angeles and while on the train I was approached through directed conversation by a woman. She said I should 'work with the police.' I went to the LAPD seeking investigation into the protest incident and never heard back. It was at this point that the v2k attacks began, as well as directed energy and gangstalking intensified. This was in Jamuary of 2012 and has continued til today. I could go into the gangstalking tactics and voice to skull and directed energy but it is rather long and maybe it will be detailed.