*This is the true face of CYBER Warfare:*

Came across this today. This appeared in the International Law Journal of London posted by Kim O'neill

*This is the true face of CYBER Warfare:*
INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL OF LONDON *November 25th, 2014* by Dr. Parasaran Rangarajan
*PROTECTING BRAINWAVES CONSIDERING SIGNAL INTELLIGENCE ADVANCES* (Abstract)
“*This article aims to demonstrate and explore the avenues for Protection of Brainwaves of Ideas in relation to Advances in Surveillance Technology, more specifically Signal Intelligence Technology*, via three sections:
1. Describing the *Advances in Signal Intelligence Technology today and its Relevance to Brainwaves*. Also discussed is the Anatomical description of Brainwaves.
2. Then, *we build on the basis that These Technologies Exist and the Need to Seek Legal Protection from them*. Various Electronic Communication Law and Human Right Laws including cases are introduced.
3. The last part deals with both transnational law with the steps the European Union (E.U.) has taken to offer protection under international law, both as an intellectual property and human rights issue.

Section one is split into two parts. In the *first part*; the article *explains the Advances in Electronic Signal Intelligence Technology including U.S. patented Electromagnetic Devices which are Designed to Read, Alter, and even Attack Brainwaves*. Important *Scientific Proof of Reading Brainwaves and the Mind* by Reconstructing Thoughts "Word for Word" from Various Research Institutions as well as *using Wireless Electroencephalography (EEG)* which have demonstrated *similar to "iBrain" Product* is presented to provide the basis for the rest of the article. Some of the *Dangers and Capabilities of these devices are stated by the facts*. In the second part; the article explains an anatomical views of brainwaves in the case that they cannot be viewed as electronic communications but viewed as the heart for example despite the advances in signal intelligence technology. Theoretical discussions by various authorities and scholars are presented. An introduction to the various human rights legislature which have been introduced in the past is also stated and *Direct Energy Weapons (DEW) as well as Active Denial Systems* (ADS) are explained. We also go various *Electromagnetic Brain Frequencies Emitted which can Explain States of Mind including the Schumann Resonance (7.83 Hz) phenomenon when your brainwaves are one with the earth’s electromagnetic spectrum eminences*.

*Section two deals with Protecting Our Rights in relation to Intellectual Property and Human Rights* and is divided into two scenarios. Under the first scenario; we focus in on *Protecting Brainwaves* given the two scenarios above being *viewed as “electronic communications” and “data” given that there is consent or judicial sanction*. In this scenario, the article reviews the relevant case law such in the U.S. for limits on warrantless surveillance where intellectual property rights are taken away including the defense related provisions such as the Patriot Act (2001). In addition to intellectual property laws, classic cases on electronic surveillance for practical purposes such as discovery and subpoenas such as Katz v. United States (1935) are discussed in relevance with the electromagnetic technologies of today. An analysis of existing laws such as the Electronic Communications Protection Act (ECPA) including the need for reforms on the lines of the *Public Act 256 of 2003 in Michigan which has expressly banned Electromagnetic Devices for Harmful uses* is conducted. Under the second scenario; protection of brainwaves are discussed as a human rights issue and the various *U.S. human rights legislation is brought up such as the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA) in addition to international legislation the U.S. is bound by and relatively new cases on this subject such as James Walbert v. Jerimiah Redford (2008) which is the first case in U.S. history to Recognize Electromagnetic Weapons being Used Against a Person*.

*Section three* is also divided into two parts and *focuses on International Law and Transnational Law on Protecting Brainwaves in as both “Electronic communications” and “data” as well as examining the issue from a Human Rights Perspective*. First; *European Union law is introduced with issued Regulations and Directives which have Banned Surveillance on "Biometric" and "Genetic data" which is Applicable to Brainwaves*. In the second part dealing with International law; we discuss to *Protect Intellectual Property of Brainwaves through customary international law such as the “International Bill for Human Rights”, various United Nations (U.N.) Conventions, and options available for seeking remedy*. The role of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) is discussed and *we also explore the need for drafting a separate U.N. Convention for this purpose with reference to the utilitarian-pragmatic argument considering the philosophy of thought in society*.

The article is concluded by stating that *We have long ways to go in Protecting our Brainwaves due to Technological Advances in Signal Intelligence* although we have gotten off to a fair start in the U.S., E.U., and internationally.
http://www.internationallawjournaloflondon.com/protecting-b…
(Note from channel - *Laws exist Every Where for Protection & Prosecution for this type of Crime - International, National, even States - yet No One Is listening nor Abiding by Any of them*)

Email responses from thread that led to shutting down and destroying my new computer

I want to share my email thread that led to the shutting down of my computer, but I can't share someone else's private communication, so here is the content of my responses:

Hi Heidi,

I'm
sorry for your targeting. I think it's possible that
there are black hats and white hat handlers. One being
darker than the other and more evil, but they are all evil.
My handlers could kill me at any time and could torture me
into more terrible existence but do not. It only makes sense
that if they attack me and I have the internet to turn to
that they can see the effect of targeting me. When they do I
go to the internet and meetup with other targets share the
story etc. It seems pretty clear to me that they want me to
do this. They even gave me the name Brooke like Brooke Hogan
to express that they were 'making me' like in the
show she was on. They also expressed that what they are
doing was like a twisted game of professional wrestling.
Sometimes they even give me positive feedback for going
online. They also want to control what I say and so that I
have a tight message, and they'll give me negative
feedback from time to time depending on what I say and
think. The whole thing is a psychological operation with
targets being sacrificed for the psyops...

What was your journalism about? I
believe they have wanted me to believe that there was some
jealousy reason for my targeting, but I think it is
political.

Best,
Dominic Friscia

Other Response:

Well that would be a reason they would attack you. I don't know the motives of your handlers. They could be trying to hide that they are sacrificing disabled kids lives at schools. In my case, they want me to be an influential agent, so they sacrifice my freedom and dignity because there is something I say that they want to lend credibility to. If the government hounds you then people think "well there must be something they don't want people knowing" and they pay attention to what you say. The secondary aspect to the targeting is that they are human traffickers trying to control me. Also When I'm less bloated they harass me more to make sure I don't have self esteem etc.