*This is the true face of CYBER Warfare:*

Came across this today. This appeared in the International Law Journal of London posted by Kim O'neill

*This is the true face of CYBER Warfare:*
INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL OF LONDON *November 25th, 2014* by Dr. Parasaran Rangarajan
*PROTECTING BRAINWAVES CONSIDERING SIGNAL INTELLIGENCE ADVANCES* (Abstract)
“*This article aims to demonstrate and explore the avenues for Protection of Brainwaves of Ideas in relation to Advances in Surveillance Technology, more specifically Signal Intelligence Technology*, via three sections:
1. Describing the *Advances in Signal Intelligence Technology today and its Relevance to Brainwaves*. Also discussed is the Anatomical description of Brainwaves.
2. Then, *we build on the basis that These Technologies Exist and the Need to Seek Legal Protection from them*. Various Electronic Communication Law and Human Right Laws including cases are introduced.
3. The last part deals with both transnational law with the steps the European Union (E.U.) has taken to offer protection under international law, both as an intellectual property and human rights issue.

Section one is split into two parts. In the *first part*; the article *explains the Advances in Electronic Signal Intelligence Technology including U.S. patented Electromagnetic Devices which are Designed to Read, Alter, and even Attack Brainwaves*. Important *Scientific Proof of Reading Brainwaves and the Mind* by Reconstructing Thoughts "Word for Word" from Various Research Institutions as well as *using Wireless Electroencephalography (EEG)* which have demonstrated *similar to "iBrain" Product* is presented to provide the basis for the rest of the article. Some of the *Dangers and Capabilities of these devices are stated by the facts*. In the second part; the article explains an anatomical views of brainwaves in the case that they cannot be viewed as electronic communications but viewed as the heart for example despite the advances in signal intelligence technology. Theoretical discussions by various authorities and scholars are presented. An introduction to the various human rights legislature which have been introduced in the past is also stated and *Direct Energy Weapons (DEW) as well as Active Denial Systems* (ADS) are explained. We also go various *Electromagnetic Brain Frequencies Emitted which can Explain States of Mind including the Schumann Resonance (7.83 Hz) phenomenon when your brainwaves are one with the earth’s electromagnetic spectrum eminences*.

*Section two deals with Protecting Our Rights in relation to Intellectual Property and Human Rights* and is divided into two scenarios. Under the first scenario; we focus in on *Protecting Brainwaves* given the two scenarios above being *viewed as “electronic communications” and “data” given that there is consent or judicial sanction*. In this scenario, the article reviews the relevant case law such in the U.S. for limits on warrantless surveillance where intellectual property rights are taken away including the defense related provisions such as the Patriot Act (2001). In addition to intellectual property laws, classic cases on electronic surveillance for practical purposes such as discovery and subpoenas such as Katz v. United States (1935) are discussed in relevance with the electromagnetic technologies of today. An analysis of existing laws such as the Electronic Communications Protection Act (ECPA) including the need for reforms on the lines of the *Public Act 256 of 2003 in Michigan which has expressly banned Electromagnetic Devices for Harmful uses* is conducted. Under the second scenario; protection of brainwaves are discussed as a human rights issue and the various *U.S. human rights legislation is brought up such as the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA) in addition to international legislation the U.S. is bound by and relatively new cases on this subject such as James Walbert v. Jerimiah Redford (2008) which is the first case in U.S. history to Recognize Electromagnetic Weapons being Used Against a Person*.

*Section three* is also divided into two parts and *focuses on International Law and Transnational Law on Protecting Brainwaves in as both “Electronic communications” and “data” as well as examining the issue from a Human Rights Perspective*. First; *European Union law is introduced with issued Regulations and Directives which have Banned Surveillance on "Biometric" and "Genetic data" which is Applicable to Brainwaves*. In the second part dealing with International law; we discuss to *Protect Intellectual Property of Brainwaves through customary international law such as the “International Bill for Human Rights”, various United Nations (U.N.) Conventions, and options available for seeking remedy*. The role of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) is discussed and *we also explore the need for drafting a separate U.N. Convention for this purpose with reference to the utilitarian-pragmatic argument considering the philosophy of thought in society*.

The article is concluded by stating that *We have long ways to go in Protecting our Brainwaves due to Technological Advances in Signal Intelligence* although we have gotten off to a fair start in the U.S., E.U., and internationally.
http://www.internationallawjournaloflondon.com/protecting-b…
(Note from channel - *Laws exist Every Where for Protection & Prosecution for this type of Crime - International, National, even States - yet No One Is listening nor Abiding by Any of them*)