excerpt Written by Thomas Fontanez McFarlan:

  "There have been a number of individuals with long and decorated careers within the intelligence agencies, at leadership levels, that have left their official positions of power to come forward, and warn the nation and world, since the September 11th attacks — explicitly blowing the whistle on the current security-service-stalking and electronic weapon problem including: Dr. Barry Trower, Edward Snowden, Thomas Drake, William Binney, Kirk Wiebe, Karen Stewart, Mark Phillips and Ted Gunderson. Mr. Gunderson, a 30-year veteran of the FBI and Director of the Los Angeles FBI office, even wrote and signed a legal affidavit disclosing his knowledge that security-service-stalking was truly happening all across America and many details about the phenomenon. He did this to help the targeted individual community legally prove that this phenomenon was real. This affidavit is embedded in this essay under this paragraph. Many other leaders in the fields of science, medicine, psychology and the military, who have worked with intelligence agencies, have also come forward since the September 11th attacks to explicitly blow-the-whistle on the current security-service-stalking problem including: Paul Batcho PhD, Dr. Nickolas Begich, Richard Lighthouse, Doug Rokke PhD, Carl Clark, Dr. Corkin Cherubini, Dr. Collin Ross, and William Taylor among many others. Probably the most significant individual within the field of medicine and science to come forward, to warn the world about security-service-stalking and electronic frequency weapons, is the late Dr. Rauni Kilde. She held a cabinet level position in Finnish government in the late 1970s — as Surgeon General of the nation of Finland. Somehow, even though all of these whistleblowers have long decorated careers working in or with the world’s intelligence agencies, have elite levels of education from highly respected universities, and live life with the highest degree of integrity — there has been little coverage of their explosive revelations in the mainstream media nor serious movement towards reform. Even within the independent media, the coverage of their extraordinary revelations has only gained aggressive coverage among the most fiercely progressive and libertarian. However, in 2016 and 2017 some serious positive momentum has been generated through the work of a number of extremely talented high-profile targeted individuals — and two high-profile security-service-stalking campaigns that broke into the mainstream news reporting in a big way."

They want me to share this MKULTRA Special ops project NBA NFL MLB UFC etc

I get persistent feedback to share this and taylored harassment sometimes or feedback for some reason based on this. If this is relevant to people or helps people I will share that I had great social anxiety growing up as a teenager. I imagine lots do. I still have it as an adult. I always was afraid that people were going to start physically fighting. I didn't like people trying to be cool. If people try to be cool nowadays I don't really care. I don't know when I started getting messed with. I didn't like my town I lived in. I never felt comfortable here. Never fit in. And really it isn't the town I've never fit in anywhere. Now I actually am made to feel more comfortable here than other places by homeland security. I still have social anxiety as an adult but not the same now it is definitely due to harassment, feeling followed. I actually feel I am part extrovert part introvert. I often times don't like sitting around too long and I like to get out. When I am free I like talking to people. With this program people will try to harass me so that's a problem. I'm wanderlust in good weather and when I feel free. I played basketball all through childhood I was in 3-4 leagues at a time I was obsessed, probably a musical instrument would have been better. I didn't play in high school and got depressed. I should have played parks n rec because it was fun and healthy. The only place I really ever felt comfortable as a kid was playing sports. As I got older I realized sport is used for propaganda and for molding the nation. I played football in high school as my sport outlet. I thought I wasn't good enough to start for skilled positions was told I was going to grow so I picked lineman. That was mistake. I didn't know anything about nutrition. I put on alot of weight since I stopped playing basketball all day. And I tried beef up for the sport. I was tiny. But it was a good learning experience. A former teammate later after college posted this big long post about UnAmerican Activities committee and starting a new one. I felt it was directed at me. He was kind of weird guy. Now the security services do all this grandiose propaganda with sport mind control etc directed at me. Something happened when I was a kid and they started monitoring me. That's why I share this. At one point when I was in Catholic school I daydreamed that God was really a human mob boss. Joe Atwill actually has theorized that Jesus was Roman Emperor, Titus Flavius. My confirmation teacher later stalked me and yelled FU to me for unclear reasons. Still don't know if he was serious. I actually think the Antifa vs White Nationalist fights is, in part, an MK Ultra Fight Club directed at me. The KKK had a headquarters in this town. When I was at occupy I believe the security services started fights so I would break them up. I'm too old for that now unless I see someone getting pummeled I'm going other way. I used to step in and stop that. They still on occasion create confrontations. I still fear being in crowds because I worry that a fight is going to break out. It's a little irrational. Thats why those people started that fight at Disneyland. And other places.

European Parliament addresses American radio frequency weapons that "manipulate human beings " in 1999.

In 1999 the STOA (Scientific and Technological Options Assessment), part of the Directorate General for Research of the European Parliament published a report on Crowd Control Technologies. In the report, it discusses radio frequency weapons that manipulate human beings. It states that:

”This report evaluates the second generation of ‘non-lethal’ weapons which are emerging from national military and nuclear weapons laboratories in the United States as part of the Clinton Administration’s ‘non-lethal’ warfare doctrine now adopted in turn by NATO. These devices include weapons using… directed energy beam,…radio frequency, laser and acoustic mechanisms to incapacitate human targets” The report states that „the most controversial ‚non-lethal‘ crowd control … technology proposed by the U.S., are so called Radio Frequency or Directed Energy Weapons that can allegedly manipulate human behavior… the greatest concern is with systems which can directly interact with the human nervous system“ The report also states that „perhaps the most powerful developments remain shrouded in secrecy“

religious motivation for the Targeted Individual program:

I believe that the religious motivation for Security Services Stalking varies as well. The religion identified most with the program is Satanism and there is hard evidence for the involvement of satanism in the program with Michael Aquino's involvement and documents attributed to him about psychological warfare and mind wars. However, I'll believe that there's no other religious element or involvement to the Security Services Stalking program when churches acknowledge the crimes, denounce the activity and support those targeted. As it stands now, only The Swiss Catholic church acknowledges mind control technology and that's as far as they go. I believe that Christian participants, for example, see the Targeted as people to sacrifice for some higher authority's purpose, ultimately their God. They abuse and destroy targeted persons for their God's purpose. In some sense, the 300,000 targeted persons all live out some sick performance of Jesus Christ Superstar. For some Christians, the targeted may also represent Demons or anti-christs that they are 'battling.' I believe there is eastern religious involvement as well. Much of the human trafficking conditioning has to do with destroying the targets self esteem and making some sort of authoritarian commentary on the targeted's ego or sense of self.

18 U.S. Code § 242 - Deprivation of rights under color of law

Whoever, under color of any law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States, or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both; and if bodily injury results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include the use, attempted use, or threatened use of a dangerous weapon, explosives, or fire, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than ten years, or both; and if death results from the acts committed in violation of this section or if such acts include kidnapping or an attempt to kidnap, aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to commit aggravated sexual abuse, or an attempt to kill, shall be fined under this title, or imprisoned for any term of years or for life, or both, or may be sentenced to death.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 696; Pub. L. 90–284, title I, § 103(b), Apr. 11, 1968, 82 Stat. 75; Pub. L. 100–690, title VII, § 7019, Nov. 18, 1988, 102 Stat. 4396; Pub. L. 103–322, title VI, § 60006(b), title XXXII, §§ 320103(b), 320201(b), title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(H), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 1970, 2109, 2113, 2147; Pub. L. 104–294, title VI, §§ 604(b)(14)(B), 607(a), Oct. 11, 1996, 110 Stat. 3507, 3511.)

*This is the true face of CYBER Warfare:*

Came across this today. This appeared in the International Law Journal of London posted by Kim O'neill

*This is the true face of CYBER Warfare:*
INTERNATIONAL LAW JOURNAL OF LONDON *November 25th, 2014* by Dr. Parasaran Rangarajan
*PROTECTING BRAINWAVES CONSIDERING SIGNAL INTELLIGENCE ADVANCES* (Abstract)
“*This article aims to demonstrate and explore the avenues for Protection of Brainwaves of Ideas in relation to Advances in Surveillance Technology, more specifically Signal Intelligence Technology*, via three sections:
1. Describing the *Advances in Signal Intelligence Technology today and its Relevance to Brainwaves*. Also discussed is the Anatomical description of Brainwaves.
2. Then, *we build on the basis that These Technologies Exist and the Need to Seek Legal Protection from them*. Various Electronic Communication Law and Human Right Laws including cases are introduced.
3. The last part deals with both transnational law with the steps the European Union (E.U.) has taken to offer protection under international law, both as an intellectual property and human rights issue.

Section one is split into two parts. In the *first part*; the article *explains the Advances in Electronic Signal Intelligence Technology including U.S. patented Electromagnetic Devices which are Designed to Read, Alter, and even Attack Brainwaves*. Important *Scientific Proof of Reading Brainwaves and the Mind* by Reconstructing Thoughts "Word for Word" from Various Research Institutions as well as *using Wireless Electroencephalography (EEG)* which have demonstrated *similar to "iBrain" Product* is presented to provide the basis for the rest of the article. Some of the *Dangers and Capabilities of these devices are stated by the facts*. In the second part; the article explains an anatomical views of brainwaves in the case that they cannot be viewed as electronic communications but viewed as the heart for example despite the advances in signal intelligence technology. Theoretical discussions by various authorities and scholars are presented. An introduction to the various human rights legislature which have been introduced in the past is also stated and *Direct Energy Weapons (DEW) as well as Active Denial Systems* (ADS) are explained. We also go various *Electromagnetic Brain Frequencies Emitted which can Explain States of Mind including the Schumann Resonance (7.83 Hz) phenomenon when your brainwaves are one with the earth’s electromagnetic spectrum eminences*.

*Section two deals with Protecting Our Rights in relation to Intellectual Property and Human Rights* and is divided into two scenarios. Under the first scenario; we focus in on *Protecting Brainwaves* given the two scenarios above being *viewed as “electronic communications” and “data” given that there is consent or judicial sanction*. In this scenario, the article reviews the relevant case law such in the U.S. for limits on warrantless surveillance where intellectual property rights are taken away including the defense related provisions such as the Patriot Act (2001). In addition to intellectual property laws, classic cases on electronic surveillance for practical purposes such as discovery and subpoenas such as Katz v. United States (1935) are discussed in relevance with the electromagnetic technologies of today. An analysis of existing laws such as the Electronic Communications Protection Act (ECPA) including the need for reforms on the lines of the *Public Act 256 of 2003 in Michigan which has expressly banned Electromagnetic Devices for Harmful uses* is conducted. Under the second scenario; protection of brainwaves are discussed as a human rights issue and the various *U.S. human rights legislation is brought up such as the Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA) in addition to international legislation the U.S. is bound by and relatively new cases on this subject such as James Walbert v. Jerimiah Redford (2008) which is the first case in U.S. history to Recognize Electromagnetic Weapons being Used Against a Person*.

*Section three* is also divided into two parts and *focuses on International Law and Transnational Law on Protecting Brainwaves in as both “Electronic communications” and “data” as well as examining the issue from a Human Rights Perspective*. First; *European Union law is introduced with issued Regulations and Directives which have Banned Surveillance on "Biometric" and "Genetic data" which is Applicable to Brainwaves*. In the second part dealing with International law; we discuss to *Protect Intellectual Property of Brainwaves through customary international law such as the “International Bill for Human Rights”, various United Nations (U.N.) Conventions, and options available for seeking remedy*. The role of the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) is discussed and *we also explore the need for drafting a separate U.N. Convention for this purpose with reference to the utilitarian-pragmatic argument considering the philosophy of thought in society*.

The article is concluded by stating that *We have long ways to go in Protecting our Brainwaves due to Technological Advances in Signal Intelligence* although we have gotten off to a fair start in the U.S., E.U., and internationally.
http://www.internationallawjournaloflondon.com/protecting-b…
(Note from channel - *Laws exist Every Where for Protection & Prosecution for this type of Crime - International, National, even States - yet No One Is listening nor Abiding by Any of them*)

Email responses from thread that led to shutting down and destroying my new computer

I want to share my email thread that led to the shutting down of my computer, but I can't share someone else's private communication, so here is the content of my responses:

Hi Heidi,

I'm
sorry for your targeting. I think it's possible that
there are black hats and white hat handlers. One being
darker than the other and more evil, but they are all evil.
My handlers could kill me at any time and could torture me
into more terrible existence but do not. It only makes sense
that if they attack me and I have the internet to turn to
that they can see the effect of targeting me. When they do I
go to the internet and meetup with other targets share the
story etc. It seems pretty clear to me that they want me to
do this. They even gave me the name Brooke like Brooke Hogan
to express that they were 'making me' like in the
show she was on. They also expressed that what they are
doing was like a twisted game of professional wrestling.
Sometimes they even give me positive feedback for going
online. They also want to control what I say and so that I
have a tight message, and they'll give me negative
feedback from time to time depending on what I say and
think. The whole thing is a psychological operation with
targets being sacrificed for the psyops...

What was your journalism about? I
believe they have wanted me to believe that there was some
jealousy reason for my targeting, but I think it is
political.

Best,
Dominic Friscia

Other Response:

Well that would be a reason they would attack you. I don't know the motives of your handlers. They could be trying to hide that they are sacrificing disabled kids lives at schools. In my case, they want me to be an influential agent, so they sacrifice my freedom and dignity because there is something I say that they want to lend credibility to. If the government hounds you then people think "well there must be something they don't want people knowing" and they pay attention to what you say. The secondary aspect to the targeting is that they are human traffickers trying to control me. Also When I'm less bloated they harass me more to make sure I don't have self esteem etc.